A non-surgical body treatment that is easier to undergo than liposuction

Among patients who want to improve their body contour, many think:

• “Liposuction still feels too invasive.”
• “I want to start with a treatment that has less downtime.”
• “I want something I can do without taking much time off.”

For these patients, InMode BodyFX can be a very good option.

BodyFX is a non-surgical body treatment that uses radiofrequency energy and suction to deliver heat to the skin and fat layer.

At AVAN TOKYO, we do not think of BodyFX as a “replacement” for liposuction.

We think of it as a different option with a different kind of value.

Advantages of BodyFX

1. It generally carries less risk than liposuction and is easier to undergo

Because BodyFX does not involve incisions or surgical fat removal with a cannula, it is generally less invasive than liposuction.

For many patients, this makes it feel much easier to try.

2. It has relatively little downtime

Compared with liposuction, BodyFX usually causes much less downtime.

Temporary redness, swelling, tenderness, or mild bruising may occur, but many patients find it easier to return to daily life.

This makes it appealing for people who:

• want a less invasive treatment
• want to avoid major downtime
• are too busy for surgery
• want to improve body contour more casually

3. It can be easier to fit into everyday life

Because there are no incisions or sutures, BodyFX is often easier to incorporate into a busy schedule.

For patients who want gradual improvement rather than a surgical event, this is a major advantage.

4. It also uses heat, which may support tightening

BodyFX uses radiofrequency energy, so the treated area becomes warm during treatment.

Some patients may describe it as “hot,” but that heat is part of the treatment mechanism.

This is one reason BodyFX is often chosen by patients who want not only fat reduction, but also some degree of skin tightening effect.

Disadvantages of BodyFX

1. The change is usually not as dramatic as liposuction

This is one of the most important differences.

Liposuction physically removes fat cells.

BodyFX, by contrast, is a non-surgical treatment that applies heat and energy to the tissue.

Because of that, the result is usually more gradual and less dramatic than surgical liposuction.

BodyFX should not be chosen with the expectation of a one-time, dramatic change.

2. Multiple sessions are often needed

Because the change tends to be gradual, BodyFX usually requires several sessions rather than one treatment alone.

This makes it suitable for patients who:

• want gradual improvement
• are comfortable with repeat treatments
• prefer a maintenance-style approach

However, for patients who want the shortest path to a major change, liposuction may be more appropriate.

3. It can feel hot during treatment

Because BodyFX relies on heat, the treatment is not sensation-free.

Depending on the area and energy settings, patients may feel clear warmth or heat during the procedure.

4. Even though it is less invasive, side effects are not zero

BodyFX is generally lower risk than liposuction, but that does not mean it is risk-free.

Possible reactions may include:

• redness
• heat sensation
• mild swelling
• tenderness
• mild bruising

Because it is still an energy-based medical treatment, proper settings and careful technique remain very important.

BodyFX and liposuction are not competitors

They should be selected based on the patient’s goal

Some patients wonder,

“If liposuction is stronger, does that mean BodyFX is meaningless?”

The answer is no.

These two treatments serve different purposes.

Liposuction is a surgical treatment for patients who want stronger, more visible contour change.

BodyFX is a non-surgical treatment for patients who want lower downtime, lower burden, and more gradual improvement.

The key question is not which one is “better,”

but which one fits the patient’s goals better.

Who is a good candidate for BodyFX?

At AVAN TOKYO, BodyFX is often a good option for patients who:

• are not ready for liposuction
• are also concerned about mild skin laxity
• want a treatment with relatively little downtime
• want maintenance-style body contouring
• are considering supportive tightening after surgery

On the other hand, patients who want:

• a dramatic change in one treatment
• more significant fat reduction
• the highest possible change rate

may be better suited for liposuction.

Conclusion

The advantages of InMode BodyFX include:

• less invasiveness than liposuction
• relatively mild downtime
• a non-surgical and approachable treatment style
• the ability to use heat for contouring and tightening support

Its disadvantages include:

• less dramatic change than liposuction
• the need for multiple sessions
• a noticeable heat sensation during treatment
• side effects are still possible even without surgery

In other words, BodyFX is best understood not as a one-time dramatic treatment,

but as a lower-burden treatment that gradually improves body contour over time.

At AVAN TOKYO, we choose between BodyFX and liposuction based on the patient’s desired level of change, tolerance for downtime, and skin condition.